Product Liability Lawsuit Loans

How Legal Funding Works

TriMark specializes in helping personal injury victims. Our pre settlement funding is a simple 3-step process.

#1

Apply

You can easily apply online or by phone. It’s quick and easy, we’ll answer all your questions, and there is no obligation.

#2

Approval

Your dedicated TriMark representative will work with your attorney to review your case. No hassle. Guaranteed.

#3

Receive Cash

Receive $500 to $500,000+ within 24 hours of approval by wire transfer or FedEx Overnight. It’s that simple.

TriMark Legal Funding is a leading lawsuit financing company that offers fast and affordable lawsuit cash advances to plaintiffs in dire need of cash. With no upfront fees and collaterals required, individuals in the middle of a lawsuit can apply for and receive pre-settlement funding in just as little as 24 hours. 

Are you a plaintiff with a pending product liability claim against a giant pharmaceutical company or a multinational manufacturer? The long wait for a settlement or trial may have hurt your finances. If you’re running out of cash to cover medical and living expenses, product liability lawsuit loans may be an option you want to check out.

Recovering your losses through a lawsuit may take several months to around two years. Your settlement or compensation could come by quickly if the legal process existed in a vacuum. But in reality, it must have been difficult for you to ride out the claim given the physical, emotional, and even financial setbacks.

Getting hospitalized for your injury or going through a series of treatments to cure your illness can be one of the toughest parts. Your movements are restricted, preventing you from returning to work or reducing the hours you spend on the job. 

That’s not a good sign if you’re stuck with shouldering out-of-pocket costs, such as medical care and treatment charges, doctor fees, and physical therapy expenses. You’ll have to wait until you’re fully healed to compute the cost and include it in your claim.

At the same time, you’re also paying monthly dues non-stop like rent or mortgage, utility and credit card bills, car loans, and food and groceries.

No wonder your bank account or wallet is suffering, not to mention your family who is forced to adjust to the situation.

Amid the bleak forecast, there’s a ray of hope. Pre settlement funding is available to throw a lifeline to cash-strapped plaintiffs. It may be just what you need right now.

Call us at (877) 932-2628

Product Liability Pre Settlement Loans

Product liability is a consumer-driven law that protects customers who fall victim to defective products and the negligence of their manufacturers or sellers.

Thousands of deaths have been reported as caused by millions of injuries from defective or dangerous products in the United States each year. 

For instance, most factory workers are always at risk of physical injuries due to product failure. The machines they use daily at work are the likely culprits. 

By filing a product liability lawsuit against the manufacturer or seller, you may be eligible to get compensation for the damages caused by the faulty product.

However, this case type usually entails a complex and long legal battle. 

The victim who sustained injuries from the defective product must prove that the accident happened due to product damages, even if it was used as intended. 

The lawsuit can be stressful enough, but then, it’s just making matters worse since you’re already burdened by the cost that comes with hospitalization. 

While you shouldn’t give up on getting what you deserve, it can sometimes feel discouraging to go on while you face financial shortfalls. This is where pre settlement funding comes in.

TriMark Legal Funding can provide you with a fast, affordable, and risk-free way to get cash on your settlement even while your case is pending. 

With TriMark, you can obtain funding without creating more debt. Our product liability lawsuit loans are actually non-recourse cash advances on plaintiffs’ future settlement. 

Think about it as withdrawing your settlement money earlier. You have nothing to pay for until your actual check comes in. And if you lose, you can keep the rest of the advance and are under no obligation to return the full sum.

No credit checks, no monthly dues, no hassles. Just the money you own, made available to you when you need it most.

Get Pre Settlement Funding Now

If you are a plaintiff with an ongoing product liability lawsuit and struggling financially, you can bounce back and buy more time to negotiate a better settlement.

Application for lawsuit financing is quick and easy with TriMark.

Just click here to submit your application online, or call us toll-free at 1-(877) 932-2628

In a minute, you’re done. All you have to do is wait for us to review your funding request and the facts of your case. We’ll call or send you a message once we have the results. 

If you’re approved, you can have the cash in 24 hours or less. It’s that simple.

So why wait if you can get your life back on track starting today?

Product Liability Lawsuit Funding

Defective, faulty and malfunctioning products are responsible for millions of injuries throughout the United States each year. When an individual files a product liability case they are attempting to hold the manufacturer, wholesaler or retailer responsible for the injury. Product liability cases are often handled as class action lawsuits.

Product liability refers to the branch of tort law that holds designers, manufacturers, and sellers liable for the harm suffered by buyers and users of their defective products. A “product” can be almost anything, from an aeronautical chart to a prescription drug, medical device or a pack of cigarettes.

“Defects” include flaws in the way a product is designed, manufactured, or marketed. Typical causes of action in products liability include strict liability, breach of warranty, negligence, manufacturing and design defects, and breach of the duty to warn. Most of the time, products liability is considered a strict liability offense. This means that the plaintiff only has to prove that there is a defect in the product. Once this plaintiff has made this showing, the manufacturer or supplier causing the damages is considered to be 100% responsible, regardless of any degree of carefulness on their part or any lack of care by the consumer.

The statute of limitation in a products liability case typically begins on the date the injury occurred. Some states, however, have a discovery exception that prevents the statute of limitations from beginning to run until the plaintiff has had a reasonable opportunity to discover the defect. This is an important protection because, in many cases, the plaintiff will not discover the defect until months or even years later.

An Entire Segment of Law

Product liability is an area of law where manufacturers, retailers, suppliers, distributors and others who create, produce or sell products to the public are held responsible for the injuries those products end up causing.

Defective and/or dangerous products have been the cause of thousands of injuries in the United States each year. The product liability law is the governing principle that determines culpability for defective or dangerous products. The product liability law is unlike of ordinary injury law. Product liability laws are intended to give an easier legal and compensation process for injured parties to recover from the damages that were made.

In product liability, manufacturers or sellers are held liable for making defective products available for the market or for consumers to purchase. Culpability for defective products that cause injury is put on all those involved in the distribution chain (from the designer to the manufacturer to the distributor to the seller). Generally, the law requires that the product meets the expectations of a reasonable consumer. Obviously, defective products do not meet these expectations.

Because there is no federal law for product liability, claims of this nature are based on state laws and can be brought under doctrines of negligence, breach of warranty, or strict liability with various types of defects such as design defects, manufacturing defects, and/or marketing defects. Commercial statutes in each state which are modeled after the Uniform Commercial Code will contain warranty regulations regarding product liability.

Plaintiffs who file suits under product liability claims are eligible to get both compensatory and punitive damages. Compensatory damages typically include medical expenses of past and future, lost past and future wages, and even property damages if the case calls for it. It is important for parties to note that while product liability is intended to protect consumers, it also has regulations and stipulations that protect the parties that are typically defendants.

Product liability allegations can only be claimed if there is a defect, causation, injury, and duty. Consumers who have retained injuries from a defect in a product must also first prove that the product was used as intended and yet still suffered injuries due to the defect that made the product dangerous.

Product Liability Litigation

Product liability lawsuits aim to prove that injuries were sustained were due to the defective products and that the very defect made the product unreasonably dangerous for consumers. When a consumer uses the product as intended and still obtains harm or injury to the consumer, the product may be considered defective. Harmed or injured parties may then opt to file a lawsuit under product liability when these circumstances arise.

The most common case types of product liability include dangerous furniture, broken chair accidents, appliance hazards, food contamination, beauty and personal care product injuries, defective car parts and accessories, footwear injuries, malfunctioning and defective power tools, dangerous toys, dangerous gym equipment and dangerous drug and medical device lawsuits.

In cases of dangerous products due to the design, plaintiffs would have to prove in the lawsuit that the product had inadequate warnings regarding its dangerous disposition. These naturally dangerous products include knives, explosives, chemicals, chainsaws, and the like. Consumers are still responsible for using intrinsically hazardous products in reasonable ways. Parties can file for product liability lawsuits for injuries sustained as long as the party indeed used the product as it was intended and the product malfunctioned in some way.

Product liability lawsuits are generally considered as strict liability offenses. Strict liability disregards the extent of care that the manufacturer or distributor exercises as long as the defect in the product produces harm onto a consumer and makes the defendant liable for the damages incurred on the plaintiff.

Plaintiffs can be entitled to punitive damages in the case or egregious conduct or behavior on the part of the defendant. Plaintiffs can claim for compensatory damages which include medical expenses, lost past and future wages, and property damages, among many others. Compensatory damages will be dependent on the circumstances of each case.

The Elements of Liability

Product liability laws are intended to protect consumers who were injured through the use of various products. This law puts liability on manufacturers, sellers or distributors of the deemed defective product for making the unsafe product available to the consumer when used as intended.

Products are considered defective when the product does not work as it is expected to be and jeopardizes the used to unexpected dangers. The three defective product types are manufacturing defects, design defects, and failure to warn or simply put, marketing defects.

Product liability can be categorized into three kinds of lawsuits such as negligence, strict liability and breach of warranty. While these three forms don’t differ that much between states, the differing factors are important to understand.

Common elements of state laws include:

  1. Defect – proof that the product was defective
  2. Causation – the plaintiff was hurt by and because of the defects in the product
  3. Injury – the plaintiff obtained actual injuries because of the defect in the product
  4. Duty – the seller or manufacturer owed the consumer a duty to make and/or sell a safe product

Legal Theories For Successful Claim

There are numerous legal theories that can be used as basis for a product liability claim, such as (1) defective design, (2) manufacturing defect, (3) defective warning, (4) breach of warranty, (5) strict liability, and (6) negligence.

Defective Design
Design defects are basically intrinsic flaws or errors in a product. More often than note, these flaws were built into the product during the manufacturing process. However, the flaws can also arise during design modifications.

Manufacturing Defect
Manufacturing defects can happen even if the design was not erroneous. While the design may be flawless, products can still be defective after it is manufactured. This is pretty basic in factories as machines or even human error can still cause certain products to be faulty.

Defective Warning
Warnings can also be defective in the sense that a manufacturer fails to sufficiently warn regarding the inherent dangers associated with normal or intended use of the product. This is also known as failure to warn, and can also be classified as a marketing defect.

Breach of Warranty
Breach of warranty occurs when a product fails to accommodate to an express warranty. Manufacturers can then be culpable for injuries sustained by a consumer by the very failure to conform. Moreover, if products have no expressed statement, a breach of implied warranty may also occur when the product is not suitable for ordinary purposes of product use.

Strict Liability
Strict liability can be used as grounds for product liability cases in such a way that manufacturer can be held liable for selling defective and unreasonably dangerous products when a product is more hazardous than an ordinary customer would deem it to be.

Negligence
Negligence in product liability cases are pretty much the same for other claims of negligence. In addition to the four elements of duty, defect, causation and injury, plaintiffs would need to prove that the manufacturer or seller breached its duty to the consumer by being aware or being responsible in such a way that they should have been aware of the defects based on known or available information.

Res Ipsa Loquitur

It is important to note Res Ipsa Loquitur cases as well. By the name it holds, cases such as these, plaintiffs need not prove the existence of the product defect. Because Res Ipsa Loquitur is Latin for “the thing speaks for itself”, it basically states that the defect is very obvious that proving such defect would not be required legally.

Under this doctrine, when a reasonable person can look at the product and can clearly see the defect without any other kind of proof, then strict liability will automatically apply. In cases of allegations under Res Ipsa Loquitur, plaintiffs must show that the defect is indeed obvious and that the plaintiff was injured by the product.

Largest Product Liability Cases in the US

Product liability cases are relatively new in the world of law. The consumer-driven law is intended to protect consumers from faults on the part of the manufacturer or seller. Some of the biggest lawsuits in United States History include General Motors, Philip Morris, Dow Corning and Owens Corning with lawsuits amounting up to billions.

General Motors – Ignition switches

General Motors is facing product liability lawsuits when it was discovered in February 2014 that a significant number of its automobile models were manufactured with faulty ignition switches. The switches had the capability to shut off the engine during driving, disable power steering and brakes, and even prevent airbags from deploying.

According to GM, these faulty ignition switches have been linked to at least 13 deaths and 31 car accidents. Since then, the company recalled over 26 million of its automobiles for various reasons over the past year. A $400 million uncapped fund was set up to compensate for the death and injuries sustained by the defective vehicles.

Philip Morris – Failure to warn

In 2002, Philip Morris (now Altria Group, Inc.) was sued by a woman who had lung cancer and claimed that smoking cigarettes was the cause of her illness. In addition, the woman also said that the tobacco company’s failure to warn regarding the risks of smoking was the cause of her tobacco addition. The company was ordered to pay for punitive damages in the amount of $28 billion and the woman was paid $850,000 for compensatory damages.

Nine years later, after successfully appealing the case, Philip Morris managed to have the amount of punitive damages reduced to a mere $28 million; a staggering 1/1000th of the original punishment amount and the company is still going strong – thanks to a warning label that now informs people that cigarettes are hazardous to your health.

Merck & Co. – V

Merck & Co. holds the dubious and sinister distinction among pharmaceutical giants for the largest, most reprehensible act of unbridled corporate greed and irresponsibility in the history of American pharmaceuticals by knowingly placing profits before people.

Merck possessed clear evidence from its own internal studies – prior to requesting or receiving FDA approval to market Vioxx – that it increased the risk of heart attack by nearly 700%. 700%! Instead of withdrawing or reformulating Vioxx, Merck rushed it to market anyway and reaped tens of billions of dollars in profit for six years. Merck finally withdrew Vioxx in 2004 amid a tsunami of lawsuits, but by then the catastrophic damage had already been done.

Depending on the source, estimates say about 55,000 people died and hundreds of thousands more suffered life-changing injuries.

After the dust settled, Merck settled for $4.85 billion (a mere fraction of the profits it earned from Vioxx sales), considered it “the cost of doing business” and is still going strong.

General Motors – Damaging chemicals

Clearly, General Motors is no stranger to product liability lawsuits. The company received a product liability suit in March 2008 with allegations of the use of a damaging chemical in its Dex-Cool coolant. IT was said that this chemical caused leaks and engine damage. On behalf of 35 million GM consumers, a class action lawsuit was filed for about $20 billion. Unfortunately, consumers who filed the suit ended up receiving individual payments of only$400-$800.

Dow Corning – Silicone breast implants

It was in 1998 when Dow Corning (a joint venture of The Dow Chemical Co. and Corning Inc.) was able to reach a settlement in a class action lawsuit worth $4.25 billion. The settlement amount was $2 billion. The class action lawsuit was filed by consumers who alleged that their silicone breast implants were causing injury, rupturing, bodily damage, scleroderma and death.

General Motors – Automobile parts

It was in August 1999 when the company faced a lawsuit of personal injury and product liability claims. In this lawsuit, claims of a 1979 Chevrolet Malibu faulty gas tank caused gas tank explosions that had killed six individuals. Plaintiffs sued $4.9 billion in punitive damages.

Owens Corning – Asbestos

It was in December of 1998 when Owens Corning Corp settled to pay $1.2 billion to asbestos related product liability lawsuits. The lawsuits claimed that the asbestos materials had caused mesothelioma cancer and death. A reported 176,000 individuals were involved in the product liability case.

Scroll to Top