Police Brutality Lawsuit Loans

Legal Funding For Plaintiffs

TriMark Legal Funding can provide fast pre-settlement and post-settlement funding to police brutality victims nationwide.

Police brutality cases, along with excessive force and other police misconduct cases, can take a long time to settle. Lawsuit loans are risk-free cash advances that can be used to cover living expenses while your attorney negotiates the maximum compensation you deserve. 

Police brutality lawsuit loans are now more relevant than ever.

Police brutality or the use of excessive force is a civil rights violation. It has undesirable consequences for victims, including psychological trauma and physical injuries. Yet, it is still happening at an unprecedented rate across America.

When you experience law enforcement abuse, you have all the right to file a claim against the responsible police officers and demand for due compensation. However, the lawsuit process may take several months to a couple of years, even longer, which can put you at a disadvantage. 

While waiting for your case to settle, you cannot escape the rent and bills you need to pay. Combined with the costs of treatment and medication, the amount you have to deal with may overwhelm you and cause emotional distress and a financial shortfall. 

You might have not expected this to happen, but you do not have to deal with everything on your own. TriMark aims to help alleviate your financial woes by providing settlement loans in a fast and simple way. 

Request a free quote

Tell us how we can help and one of our team members will contact you shortly.

    Police Brutality Pre Settlement Loans

    TriMark’s settlement loans, unlike traditional loans, are non-recourse cash advances on your future settlement award. This means you won’t be required to pay any monthly fees once you receive funding. You pay only when your case settles or you win a jury verdict. If neither happens, you won’t be liable to return the advance to us.

    And since it is your money, you can use it to cover your medical bills and daily needs. 

    We know how difficult it is to undergo a lawsuit with financial restrictions, so we are here to help you in that aspect. 

    There are a few simple conditions that you need to meet to be eligible for a police brutality lawsuit loan: have a qualified contingent fee attorney, sustained proven physical injuries bearing along financial losses, a clear liability against a sufficiently insured defendant, and settlement checks that would pass through your attorney’s trust account. 

    If you are unsure if you qualify, give us a call at 1-(877) 932-2628, and our team will gladly answer your questions.

    Get Pre Settlement Funding for Police Brutality Now

    A police brutality incident is not and should never be normal. But if it happens, you should know and fight for your rights. 

    And when you experience a financial setback during the drawn-out lawsuit process, TriMark’s got your back. Our easy 3-step lawsuit loan process can get you the money you need often within just 24 hours. 

    There are no credit checks, collaterals, upfront fees, and employment and income verification. 

    You can apply online or call us at 1-(877) 932-2628 to have one of our friendly legal funding experts process your application. 

    Receive your cash in 24 hours or less after approval. That’s it! Fast and easy. 

    So, what are you waiting for?

    What Is Police Brutality Lawsuit Funding?

    Some plaintiffs may be faced with declining finances, which impact becomes more pronounced when their police brutality claim gets delayed again. The anticipation of fair compensation or settlement is soured by endless negotiations and lack of closure. 

    It’s aggravated by the fact that, with a meritorious case, you have future money that’s left untapped, but you’re struggling to meet your most urgent needs.

    You’re not alone in this experience. And fortunately, some people in your situation have chosen to get a police brutality lawsuit loan.

    Also known by other terms such as lawsuit loans, settlement funding, and lawsuit cash advance, this form of funding is available to individuals with a pending police brutality case. It is an advance you make on the anticipated value of your settlement or compensation.

    We at TriMark can provide police brutality lawsuit loans from $500 to $250,000 to our clients by tomorrow.

    Lawsuit loans are not just fast and simple to obtain; they’re also non-recourse. Meaning, you don’t have to fret each time about monthly payments. We won’t even require you to return the advance if your case loses or does not settle. You only pay us when you win or receive your settlement check through your attorney.

    Lastly, we only apply the 2x compounding rate cap, or double your advanced money, the lowest rate you can find in the market.

    How Do You Qualify for Police Brutality Lawsuit Pre Settlement Funding?

    Like any personal injury claim, your police brutality suit may be entitled to receive funding assistance. It can help you stay the course, so you won’t have to drop your claim until you win a settlement or verdict.

    Use a police brutality lawsuit loan to pay your mortgage and other bills, repair and maintain your home, buy a big-ticket expense, or cover daily expenses.

    Here are the criteria you need to satisfy to be eligible for our lawsuit:

    • Your attorney must be contingent-fee. 
    • You have sustained severe physical injuries and financial losses.
    • You have established a clear liability against a sufficiently insured defendant.
    • Your settlement check will pass through your attorney’s trust account.

    How Do You Apply for a Police Brutality Lawsuit Loan?

    Having spent more than 17 years in the legal funding industry, we at TriMark have devised a fast and efficient application process for plaintiffs, as well as lawyers. Since we understand how taxing your current situation for you, we’ve made the “getting access to funds” part convenient for you.

    Here are the steps to get a police brutality lawsuit loan:

    1. Apply via online form signup or phone call. Make sure to provide your attorney’s contact number so we can confirm with him or her your case details. We require that you or your representative submit ALL of the following:
    • Police reports
    • A theory of liability
    • The extent of your injuries
    • X-Ray and MRI reports
    • Medical and surgical procedures performed.
    • Insurance coverage limits for the defendant
    • Photo, video, or audio evidence
    • Witness statements

    We will use the information above to determine the amount of money we would expect you to receive after a settlement or a trial verdict.

    The documents shall also be the basis of the advance amount we’ll send to your account of choice. This can reach a maximum of 20% of your estimated net settlement. 

    1. Wait for 24 to 72 hours while we review your case.
    2. Get a call or email from us about your application results. If your case is approved, we’ll send you and your attorney some additional instructions, including a funding agreement, via DocuSign.

    And lastly, it’s time to release your funds through your chosen channel within one to 24 hours:

    a). Wire transfer, or ACH

    b). FedEx Overnight

    c). Western Union or MoneyGram

    d). US Mail

    Police Brutality: A Brief Background

    Under the Constitution or federal law, anyone acting under the authority of state law shall not deprive an individual of his or her rights. This statute is known as Section 1983 within Title 42 of the United States Code.

    Yet, state laws and union contracts tend to insulate officers from proper accountability through flawed or overly protective procedures, according to Seth Stoughton, a law professor at the University of South Carolina in Columbia who is a former police officer.

    The history of police brutality is also filled with stories of imbalance between the officers and the communities they serve. For instance, the African-American demographic made up 24% of those fatally shot by the police as of 2016.

    In 2019, police forces killed three people per day in the United States, coming down to a total of almost 1,100 killings.

    While these statistics do not mean that this branch of law enforcement is failing to protect the safety and security of individuals, some of them may not be abusing their authority. From killings to minor harm, these acts are known collectively as police brutality. 

    Legal Claims Arising From Police Brutality

    There are some of the most common claims made against the members of law enforcement:

    Exсеѕѕіvе Fоrсе

    Police officers may apply only the amount of force necessary and proportional to the incident. When a previously aggressive individual has been restrained, or the situation has been diffused, the use of excessive force becomes unnecessary. 

    At times, cops may grab, hold, kick, or punch a person if they’re armed or resisting arrest. This is called Empty Hand Control, which is one of the graduated methods an officer should use to de-escalate a scenario involving a stop or arrest

    • Physical presence: An officer’s physical presence is enough.
    • Verbalization: An officer’s words are enough, usually delivered in a firm but calm, non-threatening way.
    • Empty Hand Control: An officer’s physical bodily force is enough. No weapon or equipment is used. They can use soft empty hand techniques like holds or hard empty hand techniques like punches or kicks.
    • Less Lethal Methods: If an officer’s empty hands are not enough to subdue a suspect or adversary, they may use non-deadly weapons such as a baton, chemical sprays, Tasers, or police dogs.
    • Lethal Force: If an officer believes that a suspect poses a significant threat of death or physical injury, they may discharge their firearm to protect themselves and others.

    Excessive force will depend on the reason the police made the arrest, the degree of the threat, whether the suspect was resisting or fleeing arrest, what alternatives were available, and if warnings were given.

    Fаlѕе Arrеѕt and False Imрrіѕоnmеnt

    False arrest occurs when someone acting pursuant to legal authority takes a person into custody without probable cause or reasonable basis. It may lead to false imprisonment. However, the latter means unlawful confinement, which means to deprive someone of their liberty of movement. 

    Both false arrest and false imprisonment can be exhibited by a police officer who arrests a citizen without a warrant and locks them up in the county jail. False imprisonment is also applicable to, say, a driver preventing a passenger from departing a vehicle. The driver does not commit false arrest because he or she is not claiming to act under the assumption of legal authority.

    Malicious Prоѕесutіоn

    This type of claim involves a violation of the victim’s right to liberty according to the Fourteenth Amendment. A police officer began a criminal proceeding against the victim, which then ended without conviction (of the victim). Like false arrest, it occurred with a lack of probable cause.

    If this happened to you, you can file for a police brutality lawsuit.

    Unrеаѕоnаblе Sеаrсh and Seizure

    There are two things a search and seizure by a police officer lacks for it to be an unreasonable search and seizure: a search warrant and probable cause to believe that the evidence of a crime is present.

    Failure to Intervene

    Liability may extend to an officer who fails to intervene in another officer’s violation of a person’s constitutional rights. Law enforcement officers have a duty to protect from fellow officers in cases of constitutional violations.


    Latest Developments in Police Brutality Litigation…

    The city of Minneapolis has agreed to pay $1.5 million plus costs and attorneys’ fees to Jaleel Stallings, an Army veteran who sued the city after being acquitted on the grounds of self-defense after he was charged with shooting at Minneapolis police who first fired marking rounds at him. The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and the FBI are investigating the incident, which took place five days after the police murder of George Floyd. As the Minneapolis Police Department struggled to regain control of the city, a SWAT team drove around Minneapolis in an unmarked van at night, firing 40-mm marking rounds at civilians out after curfew. They then beat Stallings and his companion after Stallings fired back with a pistol, unaware they were cops. He said he purposefully missed them. Nearly a year after a jury acquitted the former St. Paul man of eight charges, including attempted murder, Stallings… Read more
    More cities and counties are avoiding trials and settling with the families of those who died at the hands of police officers. But have police officers learned anything? Everyone remembers George Floyd and Minneapolis, which gave a name and face to the Black Lives Matter movement. But ask Kent about Giovonn Joseph-McDade. That city settled with McDade’s family for $4.4 million. Or ask Auburn about the shooting death of Jesse Sarey and a case that has yet to go to trial, even after the officer was charged with murder. Or ask Tacoma and Pierce County about Manny Ellis after the Pierce County Sheriff’s Office settled for $4 million. The last session of the Legislature questioned many accountability gains from the previous legislative session by police chiefs and unions. But was that a wise move? Last year, cities and counties settled 15 misconduct and wrongful death cases for at least $34.3… Read more
    In what’s supposedly New Jersey’s largest-ever settlement for a police excessive force case, Camden County’s insurance carrier has agreed to pay $10 million to a paralyzed city man who gets round-the-clock nursing home care. The out-of-court settlement for 28-year-old Xavier Ingram – injured in a 2014 encounter with county metro cops – must be approved by U.S. District Chief Judge Juan Sanchez, who presided over Ingram’s month-long civil case that got declared a mistrial in March due to a hung jury. This deal riled Camden County officials who are “in complete disagreement,” said spokesman Dan Keashen, explaining “the insurance carrier (is) making a business decision and forcing the hand of Camden County.” “We will be settling the case with Mr. Ingram, (but) we do not believe this is the right decision,” said Keashen. The county “maintain(s) no wrongdoing took place. It is not liable for any of the actions and… Read more
    The city of Akron is refusing to promptly identify officers who shoot and kill civilians, even after the officers are back on the job. The city has previously identified officers under investigation for using deadly force. But officers' names and records are being withheld for fatal police encounters in December and February. In the December incident, an officer killed a man holding a knife to his estranged wife's throat. In February, two officers fired into a Ritchie Avenue home, killing a young man ordered multiple times to drop a handgun. In March, the Akron Beacon Journal requested the names, disciplinary records and personnel files of the officers involved in both incidents. Three weeks later, the city law department denied the request in a letter citing a handful of exemptions in state laws. Akron Police Chief Steve Mylett would not comment on the city law department's decision to withhold the information…. Read more
    Thirteen female athletes who were sexually assaulted by Lawrence G. Nassar, the former sports doctor for the U.S.A. Gymnastics national team and Michigan State University, are seeking $10 million each from the F.B.I., alleging that its agents mishandled an investigation and allowed Mr. Nassar to continue abusing more victims, a lawyer said on Thursday. The lawyer, Jamie White, said he filed a tort claim on Wednesday against the bureau that gives the government six months to settle or deny the claim. A lawsuit could follow, depending on the response, he said. It was the latest legal action to arise from the abuse of young athletes by Mr. Nassar, who is serving what amounts to life in prison for multiple sex crimes involving girls and women… Read more
    More than three years after Marcus Smith, a homeless Black man, died in police custody, the city of Greensboro announced Tuesday that it has settled a wrongful death lawsuit brought by his family for $2.57 million. Mary Smith sued the city, Guilford County, eight police officers and two paramedics in her son's controversial death, which has been fuel for those who want to reform Greensboro's police force. Video from officer-worn cameras of the September 2018 incident showed an anxious Smith, seemingly in the midst of a mental health episode, on downtown Church Street pleading for help from police before he was restrained, with his hands bound to his feet while lying on his stomach. The method of extreme restraint — commonly known as “hogtying” — led to his death, a state medical examiner later said. And it would be the foundation of the lawsuit filed by the Smith family. Since… Read more
    King County, Washington has agreed to pay $2.5 million to settle a claim by the family of Anthony Chilcott, who was shot and killed by deputies after stealing a hot-rod pickup truck and a pet poodle, according to the family’s attorney. The November 2019 incident was sharply criticized by investigators and resulted in the termination of one of the officers involved. In a rare move, the claim filed against the county by Chilcott’s mother and sister, Monica Crotty and Amanda Castro, both now living in Texas, was resolved before a lawsuit was filed and involved a face-to-face meeting with interim Sheriff Patti Cole-Tindall, a representative of the civil division of the King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office and the county’s risk manager, according to attorney Tony Russo. Russo said all three parties made a “sincere apology” to the family and that the sheriff’s office has promised to implement reforms recommended in… Read more
    The city of San Francisco will pay $700,000 to settle a lawsuit over the brutal beating of a Black man by a baton-wielding police officer who now faces criminal assault charges. Dacari Spiers sued the city in February 2020 for civil rights violations, false arrest, battery, negligence and supervisor liability. He claims officer Terrance Stangel, who is being prosecuted for assault and other charges, beat him without justification. Spiers suffered a broken wrist and leg, which required surgery, along with several lacerations that required stitches. He was forced to use a wheelchair during his recovery. San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin, a former public defender who has vowed to hold officers accountable for misconduct, charged Stangel in December 2020 on suspicion of assault with a deadly weapon, assault with force likely to cause great bodily injury, assault under color of authority and battery with serious bodily injury. The proposed $700,000 settlement was posted on… Read more
    Governor Mike DeWine’s office awarded nearly 5 million dollars in grant funds to police departments throughout the state. The Euclid Police Department is a recipient of $120,000 of those funds. Right now, Euclid police have an optional body camera policy. Officers have to buy the cameras on their own, a price that can average out to about $1,000. Out of the about 90 staff members within the department, only about a dozen have body cameras. “Officers don’t want to be forced into such a large expense on their own part. They are quite expensive and the maintenance and the storage fees are expensive, but the city decided they’d make it a priority and they’d fund this new project,” said Capt. Mitch Houser. Houser said, by and large, body cameras are something the officers support. In September of 2021, the Euclid City Council approved the purchasing of body cameras and updating… Read more
    Nearly five years after being assaulted by police officers during what he believes to have been an unjustified stop, Demetrius Hollins has settled his lawsuit against the Atlanta-area county where the incident happened. On Jan. 4, the Gwinnett County Board of Commissioners approved a $400,000 settlement, the Associated Press reports. The two officers who pulled him over on that fateful day were employed by the county rather than any of its many cities and municipalities. The settlement is one of the largest related to a police brutality case in Gwinnett County history, Hollins’ attorneys Chris Stewart and Justin Miller said in a statement. According to CW69, the lawsuit filed in September named the county, the two men who assaulted Hollins – Sgt. Michael Bongiovanni and Officer Robert McDonald – and former Gwinnett County Police Chief Butch Ayers as defendants. The county and chief were included because Hollins’ attorneys maintain there… Read more
    The city of Palo Alto paid $135,000 to a man who was bitten by a police dog while he was innocently sleeping in a backyard, according to a settlement agreement released today (Jan. 5). In exchange for the payment, Joel Alejo will release the city of all liability from the incident. It’s the fifth lawsuit related to police misconduct that Palo Alto has settled since February 2016, amounting to $1,282,500 including the Alejo case. The settlement stems from a dog attack on June 25, 2020, at 1847 Elsie Ave. in Mountain View that hospitalized Alejo with gashes on his leg. Alejo was sleeping in his family’s backyard while police were searching for a kidnapping suspect around 2:30 a.m. Palo Alto Agent Nick Enberg responded with his German shepherd. He entered the property through the side gate and came across Alejo laying down in a shed. Enberg then ordered his dog… Read more
    A police department near Austin, Texas, has settled a wrongful death lawsuit after a Black man named Javier Ambler II died in custody in 2019 as officers filmed for Live PD, a now-cancelled reality television show. KEY FACTS The commissioners court in Williamson County, located just north of Austin, voted Tuesday to approve a $5 million settlement in Ambler’s wrongful death lawsuit. Williamson County will pay $1.6 million of the settlement, while the rest will be covered by the county’s insurance. Ambler’s family filed the lawsuit in October, alleging that then Sheriff Robert Chody encouraged his officers to engage in “dangerous, high-risk police tactics” because it made for “more entertaining television.”  TANGENT Police pursued Ambler in a car chase in March 2019 after he didn’t dim his headlights in the direction of oncoming traffic, according to an investigation by the local station KVUE and the Austin American-Statesman. J.J. Johnson, an officer regularly featured on Live PD, followed… Read more
    Aldermen are set to consider recommendations from the city’s attorneys to pay approximately $3 million to settle five lawsuits claiming Chicago police officers committed a wide range of misconduct, including during a high-speed chase that ended with the death of a 55-year-old woman. The largest settlement — $2 million — would go to the family of Julia Lynn Callaway, who was killed in May 2018 when she was struck by a car driven by Curtis Pugh while he was being pursued by police after officers smelled marijuana coming from his car. Pugh was convicted of offenses connected to the crash, records show. Police pursuits — which often reach high speeds on crowded city streets — frequently end in crashes that injure not only those being … Read more
    In a year when the city’s lawyers were hashing out the details of a federal consent decree that will govern police reform efforts for years to come, Chicago taxpayers paid out more than $85 million to settle police misconduct lawsuits and an additional $28 million to outside lawyers to defend these cases. The amount paid out for police misconduct in 2018 is more than the city has paid in any year since at least 2011, according to data released by the city’s Law Department and analyzed by The Chicago Reporter, and more than what was paid in the previous two years combined. It brings the total tab for police misconduct in the past eight years to well over half a billion dollars…. Read more
    The cost of resolving police brutality lawsuits and police misconduct cases has surged for big U.S. cities in recent years, even before the current wave of scrutiny faced by law-enforcement over tactics. The 10 cities with the largest police departments paid out $248.7 million last year in settlements and court judgments in police-misconduct cases, up 48% from $168.3 million in 2010, according to data gathered by The Wall Street Journal through public-records requests…. Read more

    See More

    Scroll to Top