Police Officer Kills Dog for Walking Toward Him With Tail Wagging
Category: Civil Rights
More Info: Personal Injury Loans
Bradley Brock says his dog Moose was walking toward a police officer wagging its tail when the officer gunned his pet down.
For Bradley Brock, his 3-year-old mastiff named Moose was his family and his support after a serious motorcycle accident. In a span of seconds on a November night last year, a police officer in Inkster, Michigan, took all of that from Brock when the officer shot Moose multiple times as the dog approached him.
Brock says, and video appears to show, the dog wagging its tail as it trots toward the officer. Brock has now filed a federal civil rights lawsuit arguing that the shooting was an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment.
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
The shooting is another alleged instance of an officer misreading dog behavior and slaying a pet—a sadly common occurrence that continues to devastate families, generate public outrage, results in officers being fired, and cost police departments hundreds of thousands of dollars in lawsuit settlements.
Brock says he called 911 on November 15 of last year after a man at a gas station pulled a gun on him. Video of the incident shows an Inkster police officer talking to Brock while Moose sits on the sidewalk a short distance away, off-leash.
Moose then trots over to Brock, wagging his tail and stopping to sniff a passing pedestrian, before turning and moving toward the officer.
“He was very friendly, but if anybody was around me, he wanted to check ’em out and make sure they’re okay,” Brock says. “That’s all, like any dog.”
However, the officer begins quickly backpedaling, draws his gun, and within seconds shoots the dog multiple times.
Brock, escorted by police, took Moose to an emergency veterinarian, where the dog was euthanized. The veterinarian report notes that the Inkster police left immediately after dropping Moose off and “refused to give an account of what happened.”
The loss of his dog crushed Brock. He had lost one of his legs in a serious motorcycle accident several years earlier, and he was training Moose to be his service dog. Brock says Moose was a rescue dog who was caged and abused for the first six months of his life.
“When I got him, he had no hair from the middle of his back to the tip of his tail,” Brock says. “They had run over his head with a truck, and it crushed his jaw and caused him to bite the tip of his tongue off. He was highly abused, so when I got him, I healed him as much as he healed me. We were partners.”
The only reason footage of the incident exists is because a security guard at a nearby marijuana dispensary captured it on video via a drone he had in the air at the time.
The Inkster Police Department told local news outlets that the battery in the officer’s body camera died immediately prior to the incident and the dash camera in his cruiser was not active either.
BOTH real-time evidence-collecting devices – devices that are always supposed to be operating and which exist to document this exact type of police misconduct – were conveniently not recording at the critical moment. Sorry, but that is just a little TOO convenient. And frankly, it smacks of collusion and evidence-tampering by the police.
Brock says the dispensary initially refused to give him the video, but he later ran into the security guard, Antonio Williams, by chance. Williams sympathized with Brock and handed over the footage.
“The video clearly shows the dog was not aggressive,” Williams told WXYZ Detroit. “The officer pulled his weapon and I don’t know how many times he fired because I was busy wondering where the bullets were going.”
Williams was fired from his job for sharing the footage with Brock, but he told WXYZ that he had no regrets.
The Inkster Police Department did not respond to a request for comment for this article. However, it previously said in a statement to Detroit’s WDIV Local 4: “The members of the Inkster Police Department are without question saddened by the loss of anyone’s pet, and we send our sympathy to the owner, however it is incumbent of pet owners to be responsible with their animals.”
Inkster police murdered his dog. Now they’re victim-blaming instead of acknowledging they are poorly-trained and trigger-happy.
Brock says he wants the police to be better trained to recognize the difference between an aggressive and friendly dog. “I get it. We live in Detroit,” he says. “People have pit bulls that are aggressive, that are guarding illegal activities. That wasn’t my dog.”
“My dog was probably 15 feet away from him when he took the first shot,” Brock says. “There’s no reason that he should have taken that shot at a dog that’s 15 feet away and wagging his tail.”
“I just want justice for my boy,” says Brock. “That’s all.”
See the original article here: https://reason.com/2022/03/17/police-officer-kills-dog-for-walking-toward-him-with-tail-wagging/
About TriMark Legal Funding
TriMark has been providing lawsuit settlement funding since 2003 and is one of America's leading national lawsuit funding companies. TriMark provides litigation financing, sometimes called 'lawsuit advances', to injured plaintiffs throughout the United States. We offer funding on hundreds of different types of legal claims including personal injury loans, employment litigation funding, work injury accident loans, workers compensation loans, mass tort litigation funding, and multidistrict litigation funding.
We also provide immediate inheritance advance funding for heirs and beneficiaries, as well as attorney funding and law firm financing for legal practices.
|Personal Injury Lawsuits||Multidistrict Litigation Funding|
Click here to see the original article.