Category Archives: Jones Act
SCOTUS weighs in on the availability of punitive damages based on alleged “unseaworthiness” of a vessel
The few admiralty cases the Supreme Court hears often address common-law questions resembling those that normally arise on land and are generally within the province of state courts. These maritime adventures tend to involve a deep journey into relatively esoteric doctrinal areas, requiring the court to determine its proper judicial role as well as to make appropriate substantive choices.
This term’s second admiralty excursion, The Dutra Group v. Batterton, presents another such occasion. On March 25, the Supreme Court will hear argument on whether a Jones Act seaman may recover damages in a suit for personal injuries based on the alleged unseaworthiness of the vessel to which he was assigned. The simplicity of that statement hides the possible challenges of the doctrinal voyage that may await the justices, depending on the course they set. The question has produced a circuit split, whose resolution will likely require the Supreme Court to interpret at least two of its recent precedents, 1990’s Miles v. Apex Marine Corp. and 2009’s Atlantic Sounding Co. v. Townsend. The case will immerse the justices in decades, if not centuries, of maritime law regarding the various remedies available to seamen in personal-injury and wrongful-death cases and their sources in general maritime and federal statutory law.
Christopher Batterton, a seaman, allegedly injured his hand while working on a dredge vessel to which he had been assigned. Batterton sought recovery from his employer, The Dutra Group, under a familiar trilogy of maritime remedies: maintenance and cure; the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. 30104; and unseaworthiness. Maintenance and cure is a limited, but strict-liability, quasi-contractual remedy that allows a seaman who is injured or falls ill in service of the ship to recover food, lodging and medical treatment until he is cured to the extent possible. The Jones Act authorizes a seaman to sue an employer for negligence, and the unseaworthiness doctrine allows recovery if injury results from a condition that renders the vessel not reasonably fit for its intended purpose. Maintenance and cure and unseaworthiness are judge-made doctrines; Congress passed the Jones Act in 1920. The Jones Act and the unseaworthiness doctrine allow a seaman recovery that compensates for loss from injury or wrongful death attributable to the employer. These damages differ from, and are more extensive than, the allowances for some basic living expenses and medical care that the more limited maintenance-and-cure action confers.
In addition to seeking compensatory relief, Batterton attributed the alleged unseaworthiness of the vessel to willful and wanton misconduct and sought punitive damages based on that theory only. That decision ultimately transformed this case from a standard maritime personal-injury dispute into a controversy worthy of certiorari. The district court denied Dutra’s motion to strike the punitive-damage count but certified that decision for interlocutory appeal, which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit accepted.
The question, whether a Jones Act seaman could recover punitive damages for an injury attributable to vessel unseaworthiness, shined a spotlight on Miles and Townsend. In Miles, the Supreme Court, 8-0, denied recovery of nonpecuniary damages for loss of society in an unseaworthiness wrongful-death action and for lost future income in an unseaworthiness survival action. It reasoned that because such damages are not available in a congressionally created Jones Act wrongful-death suit, they should be unrecoverable under the alternative tort theory of general maritime law unseaworthiness.
In Townsend, however, the Supreme Court concluded, 5-4, that punitive damages are available for breach of the duty under general maritime law to provide maintenance and cure.
Miles did not discuss punitive damages. The four Townsend dissenters concluded that the Jones Act precludes punitive damages, but the majority, having determined that issue not to be decisive, specifically did not address it.
The 9th Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision. In ruling that punitive damages may be awarded to seamen for personal injuries in a general maritime unseaworthiness action, the appellate court followed its pre-Miles precedent, in part because it found Townsend the more dispositive Supreme Court decision. The 9th Circuit read Townsend as limiting Miles to claims for loss of society and lost future earnings in unseaworthiness actions and not foreclosing punitive damages in general maritime law actions. In the 9th Circuit’s view, Miles precluded nonpecuniary damages in unseaworthiness actions but did not bar punitive damages because they do not compensate the injured party for a loss.
The 9th Circuit’s conclusion put it at odds with decisions in other circuits with sizeable admiralty dockets, including a divided 2014 U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit decision and post-Miles, pre-Townsend opinions in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 1st, 2nd and 6th Circuits, which had concluded that Miles precluded punitive-damage claims in general maritime unseaworthiness or negligence actions.
In its Supreme Court brief, Dutra argues that punitive damages are unavailable in general maritime law unseaworthiness actions. It identifies as a basic premise of Miles the separation-of-powers concern that admiralty courts should follow related congressional limits in shaping general maritime law in analogous areas and should preserve maritime uniformity. Although Miles did not involve punitive damages, Dutra interprets it as signaling that damages available in a judge-made unseaworthiness action are limited to those Congress allowed under the Jones Act. Because the Jones Act, like the Federal Employers Liability Act on which it was based, has been construed to preclude punitive damages, Miles’ command of judicial deference to congressional judgments dictates the same result for an unseaworthiness action.
Dutra construes Townsend as applying to a maintenance and cure, not unseaworthiness, action and as leaving Miles in place. The maintenance-and-cure remedy involved in Townsend was an ancient doctrine that predated the Jones Act’s statutory negligence action and furnished a distinct recovery from that provided under the Jones Act. By contrast, the unseaworthiness remedy at issue in Miles and Dutra presents an alternative to Jones Act recovery for the same injury and incident, one that courts created in its current form after Congress had provided the statutory negligence remedy.
For his part, Batterton sees Townsend as the relevant precedent and concludes that it allows a seaman to recover punitive damages in an injury action for breach of the general maritime law duty to furnish a seaworthy vessel. He argues that Townsend establishes that the long-standing availability of punitive damages at common law extends to maritime claims, including personal-injury claims, absent evidence of exclusion. Townsend deemed Miles inapplicable when the general maritime cause of action and the remedy were well established prior to adoption of the Jones Act, as Batterton argues was true of unseaworthiness and punitive damages. Dutra responds that the unseaworthiness remedy was transformed beginning in the 1940s and that no established history of punitive damages in unseaworthiness actions predated the Jones Act.
Batterton maintains that Townsend rejected the argument that Miles precluded punitive damages in general maritime personal-injury actions. Instead, Miles focused simply on the scope of the general maritime law wrongful-death remedy the Supreme Court created in 1970 in Moragne v. States Marine Lines Inc. to coincide with federal statutory wrongful-death remedies. Because congressional action had shaped the creation of the general maritime law remedy, the court naturally tailored it to reflect those statutory wrongful-death actions. Batterton would confine Miles to the wrongful-death context. Dutra argues that permitting punitive damages in a seaman’s personal-injury, but not wrongful-death, action would be nonsensical and would contravene a purpose of Moragne: to harmonize recovery for injury and wrongful death.
3/14 4pm #Admiralty Committee CLE. Topics include: admiralty jurisdiction; Jones Act; vessel status; fleet doctrine; unseaworthiness; maritime wrongful death; punitive damages; limitation of liability; Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act. Social to follow. https://t.co/Vq1La0yos1
— Fed Bar Assn – NOLA (@fbanola) March 13, 2019
Although Batterton argues that punitive damages are recoverable in an unseaworthiness injury action even if they are not available under the Jones Act, he also challenges Dutra’s premise that the Jones Act precludes awarding punitive damages. On the contrary, he maintains, the FELA and Jones Act allow the recovery of “damages,” which includes punitive relief. Batterton devotes 10 pages of his 50-page brief to arguing that punitive damages are permitted under the Jones Act and the FELA. Dutra replies that courts have never suggested that punitive damages were available under those two statutory remedies since Congress created them a century ago.
Batterton argues that punitive damages advance significant maritime policies, especially regarding personal-injury and wrongful-death claims of seamen. Dutra cautions that making punitive damages available in unseaworthiness actions would prompt potential defendants to overdeter harm by taking wasteful precautions or foregoing valuable commerce and would harm the economy, the environment and national security.
Although all nine of the current justices joined the court after Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote the decision in Miles, five of them participated in Townsend. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion, which Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer joined. Justice Samuel Alito’s dissent was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia and Anthony Kennedy.
The parties’ briefs suggest various possible outcomes. The course the court takes is likely to depend on how it construes its two most applicable precedents, how it understands the history of maritime personal-injury and wrongful-death remedies, and how it sees its role in maritime matters.
Past cases linked to in this post:
The post Argument preview: Justices consider availability of punitive damages in maritime unseaworthiness case appeared first on SCOTUSblog.
Chemical tanker Aquarius sank after explosion in Singapore Strait
Following the accident six crew went missing.
The exact details around the accident are unknown, as the shipowner and agent lost connection with the Indonesia tanker, loaded with fuel.
The accident was immediately reported to Malaysian Maritime …
Full details here
Qatari Ship Accident Report Published
The UK’s statutory Marine Accident Investigation Branch June 15 published its final report on the serious injury to a deck officer aboard the Qatari LNG tanker Zarga on March 2, 2015 while mooring at Milford Haven. It found that Steelite Superline Xtra …
Argonaut Exercise in Cyprus deals with scenario of severe maritime accident at open sea
Search and Rescue Operations Exercise Argonaut 2017 continued on Thursday and the scenario provided for a severe maritime accident at open sea on a passenger ship.
Search and Rescue Operations (SAR) as well as medical evacuation operations were carried out …
German Computer Aided Marine Contingency Planning System Developed with Tatuk GIS SDK
This project, known as Contingency Planning for Marine Pollution Control (VPS – VorsorgePlan … with respect to sustainable disaster control and hazardous materials accident prevention in German seashore areas.
VPS.system has been in use since the …
— Dan Hudson (@Confined_Spaces) June 15, 2017
Larger ships than expected traversing new Panama Canal
The unfamiliar procedure resulted in one accident last July when the Chinese container ship Xin Fei Zhou struck a wall of the Agua Clara locks on the Atlantic side of the canal, tearing a long gash in the ship hull above the waterline.
The 8,500-TEU …
Bulk carrier MAMRY crew death, cause unknown
Bulk carrier MAMRY in the afternoon June 14 reported to Greek authorities death on board, 60-year old crew died, understood in an accident.
Vessel was under way entering Aegean sea from Med, en route from Haifa Israel to Yali (Turkish or Greek, unclear …
China and Japan Holding Maritime Talks to Prevent Maritime Clashes
Japan wants a “hotline” but China unlikely to moderate its behavior.
Chinese and Japanese officials are expected to meet for high-level talks on maritime issues in July like establishing a “hotline” to diffuse potential unintended clashes.
The new talks are a positive development between countries that regularly face off in the East China Sea, and as Japan increasingly expands its operations in the South China Sea.
However, the history of similar maritime dialogues between China and the United States should caution against expectations that they will lead to meaningful diplomatic breakthroughs, or even a moderation of risky Chinese military behavior.
China disputes Japan’s administration over the Senkaku islands in the South China Sea, which it calls the Diaoyus.
Since the Japanese government took over the Senkakus from private Japanese owners in 2012, China has regularly challenged Japan’s administration over them by sending hundreds of fishing and coast guard vessels to make incursions in the waters around the islands.
Chemical tanker Chemroad Journey breached and aground off Phu Quy island in Vietnam
During the accident there were no reported injuries and no water pollution.
The weather in vicinity is bad, which additionally worsen the situation with the troubled chemical tanker.
The impact of the typhoon combined with Southwest monsoon activity at …
Full details here
Lake Michigan to get its first maritime highway
A new shipping route potentially could eliminate a million semi-trailer trucks a year from Northwest Indiana highways.
Supply Chain Solutions announced at the Rail Supply Chain Summit 2017 in the Union League Club in downtown Chicago it was launching a new cross-lake shipping route after being awarded the first marine highway designation on Lake Michigan.
The Maritime Administration will encourage freight to pass between the Port of Milwaukee and the Port of Muskegon in Michigan, which the Rail Supply Chain Summit Founder Mary Elisabeth Pitz said has the potential to greatly reduce the amount of truck traffic on the Borman Expressway passing through Northwest Indiana while en route from Michigan to Wisconsin, or vice versa.
Australian man missing near Port Moresby after boat accident off Papua New Guinea coast
“The MRCC (Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre) in PNG have worked closely with AMSA (Australian Maritime Safety Authority), Australian High Commission and Australian Defence Force, the Royal Papua Yacht Club, private members and villagers in …
— James Hollande (@JamesHollande) June 15, 2017
Petrobras Reports Explosion on Drillship in Campos Basin – The Maritime Executive
The oil firm will investigate the cause of the accident. The Norbe VIII, or NS 32, is operated by a division of Odebrecht.
She was built by DSME and is capable of drilling in water to 10,000 feet, with drilling depths to 40,000 feet.
She has previously …
Bulk carrier St Gregory ran aground on Kokkala beach in Greece
The local authorities were informed about the accident and closely monitor the situation, as Greek Coastguard sent two patrol boats to the scene.
It was estimated that vessel suffered breaches during the grounding and there is water ingress bulkhead.
Full details here
Isles of Scilly lifeboat man seriously hurt during rescue
The coastguard and emergency services were involved in his initial treatment, before the injured man was airlifted to hospital.
The Marine Accident Investigation Branch said it was aware of …
Swedish Club Publishes “Anatomy of an Accident”
Developed out of The Swedish Club’s Emergency Response Training program, Anatomy of an Accident focuses on a realistic incident scenario run by the Club with participants from important maritime services and support sectors.
This approach has been …
Two seamen missing after fishing ship El Fairell sank in collision with tanker Midvolga-2 off Barcelona
The accident was reported to the local authorities and at the scene of the capsized Spanish fishing vessel were deployed Salvamento Mairitimo rescue boats, helicopters and ROV.
The tanker resumed voyage to Alexandria, but was ordered to return Spain …
Read the original story here
Top 7 Websites for Maritime Accident Investigation Reports…. https://t.co/A2x4wekGI5
— MariTrace (@maritrace_) March 17, 2017
Russian reefer Anton Gurin collided with fishing boat in East China Sea
Anton Gurin The Russian reefer Anton Gurin collided with 4.9-ton fishing boat in East China Sea on 30 nautical miles southeast of Yeosu, Korea.
The freighter abandoned the accident and did not reported for the collision.
The fishing boat capsized and …
Freighter Lady Alida in trouble off Gwennap Head, UK
The accident was reported to the local authorities and Coast Guard station, which sent all-weather lifeboat Ivan Ellen to assist the troubled cargo ship.
The rescue boat arrived at the scene of the accident just within 25 minutes and attached a towing …
Maritime Herald article
Jury reaches verdict in death of fisherman Michael Hill when boat sank off coast of Cornwall
The JMT was raised from the seabed in September 2015 and examined as part of an inquiry by the Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB).
Its detailed report found it was “almost certain” the boat “capsized suddenly and without warning and sank very …
Preparing for an Arctic Maritime Emergency
A large-scale maritime incident might possibly affect nearby local communities.
Similarly, capacities can be developed to serve both types of incidents. Still, this categorization must be recognized and managed, albeit not under the same banner …
Engineer blames vessel owner for injuries
4 in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana against Parker Towing Company, Inc. alleging failure to to comply with the Jones Act and General Maritime Law. According to the complaint, on Sept. 19, 2014, Gates injured his back, neck …
Helix seaman’s injuries at issue for Texas Supreme Court
… the case himself, rather than conducting a trial by jury. Juries have decided Jones Act cases for decades and the high court’s decision could change this practice, granting judges much more discretion in determining the outcomes, maritime law …
Retweeted Maritime Observer (@Maritimeobservr):
Jones Act, PL480 at risk: rt Wilbur Ross's new day job: shipping… https://t.co/3ZXgeksRxn
— RonkeEmployment (@ronkeemployment) November 25, 2016
Jones Act: Maritime politics strain Gulf oil spill cleanup
Atlanta — The Coast Guard Friday “redoubled” efforts to keep the Deepwater Horizon oil spill from impacting Gulf states by calling in more skimming boats and equipment from the Netherlands, Norway, France, and Spain after previously telling one Dutch …
Employee alleges ship operators’ negligence led to injuries
Best Bet Line Handler, and PACC Container Line Pte Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Pacific Carriers Limited, are being sued and alleging violations of the Jones Act and General Maritime Law. According to the complaint, on Aug. 18, 2015, Ramirez …
The Jones Act – a new enforcer on the block
Observers of the US maritime scene are set to become familiar with a new acronym – JADE – a newly established office within the New Orleans field office of the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) tasked with enforcement of the Jones Act. The law …
With promises for infrastructure, regs, Trump sets bar high for shippers – JOC.com
Meanwhile, US-flag proponents say Trump’s emphasis on national security and growing jobs could boost US shipbuilding and strengthen the Jones Act. More traditional free-market conservatives in the Republican-controlled House and Senate, however, …
Trump’s Win Creates New Uncertainties for Shipping
Jones Act privileged U.S. flagged ships have a lock on coastwise trade and lucrative government cargo contracts can, and many do, bring their vessels to Mexico for repair instead of using U.S. shipyards. They pound there chest as promoters of the Jones …
Steady decline in Jones Act ships
Source: US Department of Transportation, Maritime Administration Ironically, the Jones Act has done the opposite of some of it’s original goals. By forcing Americans to use American built ships for domestic cargo shipping, the Jones Act has stifled the U …
In Defense of the Jones Act for Puerto Rico
The American Maritime Partnership (AMP) has released a statement regarding Rep. Gary Palmer’s (R-AL) proposed measure to exempt Puerto Rico from the Jones Act – which requires waterborne cargo between two points in the United States to be transported …
Sink the Jones Act: Restoring America’s Competitive Advantage in Maritime-Related Industries
The Jones Act drives up shipping costs, increases energy costs, stifles competition, and hampers innovation in the U.S. shipping industry. Originally enacted to sustain the U.S. Merchant Marine, the law has instead fostered stagnation in the U.S. maritime …
The individual thought about the personal agent of a seafarer/ team member who died on coast or within